Comments for Richard's Random Ramblings http://blog.rjcox.co.uk Whatever I think is interesting... mostly about computing but not always Sun, 08 Aug 2010 04:06:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on Demonstrating Custom Configuration Sections for .NET (Part 1) by James Phillips http://blog.rjcox.co.uk/2010/05/17/custom-configuration-1/comment-page-1/#comment-608 James Phillips Sun, 08 Aug 2010 04:06:18 +0000 http://blog.rjcox.co.uk/?p=128#comment-608 thanks! Very helpful. thanks! Very helpful.

]]> Comment on Demonstrating Custom Configuration Sections for .NET (Part 1) by Tweets that mention Richard's Random Ramblings » Blog Archive » Demonstrating Custom Configuration Sections for .NET (Part 1) - Whatever I think is interesting… mostly about computing but not always -- Topsy.com http://blog.rjcox.co.uk/2010/05/17/custom-configuration-1/comment-page-1/#comment-324 Tweets that mention Richard's Random Ramblings » Blog Archive » Demonstrating Custom Configuration Sections for .NET (Part 1) - Whatever I think is interesting… mostly about computing but not always -- Topsy.com Wed, 19 May 2010 00:26:39 +0000 http://blog.rjcox.co.uk/?p=128#comment-324 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Richard Cox. Richard Cox said: Blogging on custom .config in .NET (mostly so I can recall it when I need it): http://tinyurl.com/36gbzsm [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Richard Cox. Richard Cox said: Blogging on custom .config in .NET (mostly so I can recall it when I need it): http://tinyurl.com/36gbzsm [...]

]]> Comment on Requirements for IObservable<T> by Richard http://blog.rjcox.co.uk/2010/01/10/iobservable-req/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Richard Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:06:41 +0000 http://blog.rjcox.co.uk/?p=18#comment-3 @Scott: Two reasons really (and mostly the first). The number of helpers to create an Observable is not obvious when starting to look at RX (this is inevitable, documentation always lags), and second it helps to understand why RX is the way it is. Of course Subject<T> can be used in pretty much the way the first version of ObserverableSource<T> will be (just to emphasise the point :-)). @Scott: Two reasons really (and mostly the first). The number of helpers to create an Observable is not obvious when starting to look at RX (this is inevitable, documentation always lags), and second it helps to understand why RX is the way it is. Of course Subject can be used in pretty much the way the first version of ObserverableSource will be (just to emphasise the point :-)).

]]> Comment on Requirements for IObservable<T> by Scott Weinstein http://blog.rjcox.co.uk/2010/01/10/iobservable-req/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Scott Weinstein Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:01:08 +0000 http://blog.rjcox.co.uk/?p=18#comment-2 Why not just use of of the many ways of creating Observables from the FW (such as Create,Generate, FromEvent, FromAysncPattern )? Why not just use of of the many ways of creating Observables from the FW (such as Create,Generate, FromEvent, FromAysncPattern )?

]]>